Taking chips and snacks from a shared plate makes them seem less fattening and people put on weight after seeing it as ‘free food’, researchers suggest
- For diners, food appears less fattening to them when it is shared because they do not feel they ‘own’ the food
- This perceived lack of ownership when sharing food means people ‘mentally decouple calories from their consequences’
- Research found that losing this judgement makes diners want to eat more food
People are underestimating how fattening food is when they share a meal or snack with others, research has found.
For diners, food appears less fattening to them when it is shared because they do not feel they ‘own’ the food.
This perceived lack of ownership when sharing food means people ‘mentally decouple calories from their consequences’, Canadian scientists have suggested.
The research, published in the Journal of Consumer Psychology, also found that losing this judgement of how fatty a food is when sharing makes diners want to eat more given that they viewed it as a ‘free’ meal.
For diners, food appears less fattening to them when it is shared because they do not feel they ‘own’ the food
Scientists Nükhet Taylor and Theodore Noseworthy said their findings suggested that sharing snacks or small plates at restaurants with family and friends may actually be encouraging ‘excessive caloric intake’ by leading people to underestimate how fattening the food is.
Dr Taylor told The Times: ‘When we see food on a shared plate, we still understand how many calories we are consuming, but we do not think that those calories will impact our waistline.
‘In other words, because the shared plate does not belong to us, it is a common plate shared with someone else, we believe that whatever we eat from that plate will not be of consequence to our weight.
‘This, in turn, makes us want to eat more, given that there are no consequences to our food consumption.
‘We find that this intuition can be quite problematic for weight management because we end up consuming more calories as a result of sharing food with others.’
The researchers believe that a perceived lack of ownership over shared food makes the calories feel inconsequential, possibly due to what is known as ‘mental accounting’ – a process which allows consumers to use mental accounts to keep track of monetary expenses and caloric budgets.
They believe that it may be that consumers do not include the calories they have consumed from sharing food in their caloric budgets because they believe those calories do not belong to them.
People are underestimating how fattening food is when they share a meal or snack with others, research has found (file image)
In their study, Taylor and Noseworthy carried out three experiments with 719 people.
In one experiment, they found that people found chips shared with a friend from one plate 15 per cent less fattening than the same amount of chips on separate plates.
When dining alone, they found chips 18 per cent less fattening, despite the fact that the calories were exactly the same.
Even with healthy snacks, the same amount of almonds were perceived as being 22 per cent less fattening when shared with a friend, compared to when dining alone.
Those within the experiment were also given chocolate M&M’s, which they found 20 per cent less fattening when eaten from a shared bowl compared to when eaten alone.
It meant that for both healthy and unhealthy snacks, sharing reduced the perceived fattening of the foods.
‘This suggested that sharing was reducing perceived ownership, and this was lowering fattening judgments for both healthy and unhealthy food items,’ the researchers wrote in the study.
‘Thus, rather than a motivational mechanism that hinges exclusively on unhealthy food, it seems that sharing is causing a general bias. Critically, these results occurred in the presence of explicit caloric information.’
In the final experiment, participants had to imagine being at a McDonald’s and eating a shared box of Chicken McNuggets that belonged to them or a friend.
They were then asked after eating the nuggets to choose between apple slices, a low-calorie option, or an ice-cream sundae, a high-calorie option, for dessert.
Those who had imagined eating the nuggets owned by their friend were 13 per cent more likely to choose the sundae for dessert than those who imagined eating their own nuggets.
‘Our findings suggest that food sharing may be encouraging excessive caloric intake by leading consumers to underestimate the fattening potential brought on by shared food consumption,’ the study concluded.’
Source: Read Full Article